Cleft Sentences and Counterfactual Conditionals: Students’ Common Ground Enhancing Presuppositional Interpretation (Published)
The paper explors the use of presupposition in cleft sentences and counterfactual conditionals triggers. It attempts to determine which kind of presupposition strategies that Iraqi EFL university students follow in doing so. A diagnostic test (which consists of six items, each 3 items have a certain type of the presupposition triggers) is administered to a sample of 50 4th year students. An extended model includes Geurts’ (1999) presupposition triggers and Domaneschi’s (2016) presupposition strategies is used to elicit strategies that are employed by EFL students in order to approach the pragmatic interpretations of presupposition for cleft sentences and counterfactual conditionals triggers. The data are analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively. The paper infers that Iraqi EFL university students are familiar with the presuppositions of counterfactual conditionals more than the cleft sentence triggers. Relationally, resolution strategy is preferred to the accommodation and rejection strategies.
Citation: Hussien A.L. and Mohammed H.I. (2022) Cleft Sentences and Counterfactual Conditionals: Students’ Common Ground Enhancing Presuppositional Interpretation, International Journal of English Language Teaching, Vol.10, No.7, pp.,11-22
Keywords: Interpretation, cleft sentences, counterfactual conditionals, students' common ground
Prosodic Training Benefit for Farsi-English Interpreter Trainees: Does Gender Matter? (Published)
This study investigates the effect of gender on the quality of interpreting by 30 Iranian BA students of English translation and interpreting. In the experiment, the control group (7 males, 8 females) received the routine instruction of the interpreting curriculum. The experimental group (7 males, 8 females) spent less time on the routine syllabus and instead received explanation of prosodic concepts and did prosodic exercises as participants in the two groups were matched on the basis of their scores on a pre-test of general English proficiency. Interpreting performance was assessed in a post-test by having three experts rate ten aspects of interpreting quality. Then, t-tests were run on the male and female subsamples to see whether gender affects the performance of participants in the pre- and posttest and in the difference between the two test scores. There is a slight (but statistically insignificant) advantage for women both in the pre-test (8 points better on average on the scale from 0 to 700,) and in the post-test (3 percentage points, but again insignificant). These results have implications for designers of curricula for training interpreters, material producers and all who are involved in foreign-language study and pedagogy
Keywords: Consecutive Interpreting, Gender, Interpretation, foreign language learning