This research aims to elaborate the implementation of the policy of equalizing administrative positions into functional positions at the Central Buton Regency Personnel and Human Resources Development Agency (PHRDA) as measured by organization, interpretation and implementation. This research uses a descriptive qualitative approach. The researchers act as the main instrument by using purposive sampling as a technique for determining informants. Data sources are primary data and secondary data. Data was collected using interview, observation and documentation techniques. Data were analyzed by data reduction, data presentation, and conclusions drawing. The results of the research show that the implementation of the policy for equalizing administrative positions into functional positions at the PHRDA of Central Buton Regency in the last 1 year after being appointed to their functional positions has not been well organized from 3 aspects. First, organizing: it was found that there was an organizational structure and work procedures (OSWP) used after position equalization is different from the PHRDA OSWP in the 2017-2022 PHRDA strategic plan document. The new OSWP for administrative positions, especially supervisory positions in every field, has been abolished, but in reality, administrative officials still have not had their positions equalized into functional positions, the position map still uses the old position map, the provision of allowances is in accordance with their functional position, educational background, facilities, infrastructure, and the method of implementation are not yet optimal. Second, interpretation found that functional officials whose positions have been equalized still do not understand the main duties and functions as functional officials because from the beginning of policy implementation they have underestimated this policy, functional officials have not developed their careers as follows competency tests or job training that can support careers. Third, implementation found that the process of equalizing positions was not appropriate because not all administrative officials had equal positions so that they were ineffective and inefficient.
Keywords: Policy Implementation, administrative positions, equalization of positions, functional positions
