Psychotherapeutic management of people living with peptic ulcer disease in the DRC: Factors, Symptomatology, Diagnosis and Treatment (Published)
For centuries and across countries, the stomach ulcer (gastritis) has been considered a chronic disease, now we have full evidence with the evolution of science that the cure is eventually possible and this regardless of the announcing factor (psychological, genetic, environmental or even bacterial) provided that its management is anticipatory and early, since the complication of the disease would consequently risk becoming chronic and not curative. The present study sought to address the concern of the combined influence of psychotherapeutic management of people living with peptic ulcer disease and the tolerance threshold of aftercare in the context of the city of Butembo (DRC). The objective is to establish the solemnity of psychotherapeutic care as a complement to medicinal and/or chemotherapeutic practices by identifying the bio-socio-psychological explanatory factors of peptic ulcer disease, such as the reinforcement of the subject’s coping capacities; the more efficient and simpler implementation of his means of defense; obtaining the greatest possible symptomatic improvement of the subject; freeing him/her from the external constraints of treatment models having a considerable impact on the subject’s environment; and facilitating concrete adjustments in the patient’s life and/or psychological support in a well-determined crisis period.
Citation : Yende R.G., Omari Ndafa E., Mathe K.J., Asifiwe C.G., Ndingila G.H., Koyangalo B.T.. (2023) Psychotherapeutic management of people living with peptic ulcer disease in the DRC: Factors, Symptomatology, Diagnosis and Treatment, European Journal of Biology and Medical Science Research, Vol.11, No.2, pp.,21-46
Keywords: Diagnosis, Management, Psychotherapy, Stomach, Therapy, Treatment., chronic disease, duodenum, gastritis, gastroduodenal, symptomatology, ulcer
Laparoscopic Cystogastrostomy for Pancreatic Pseudocyst (Case Report) (Published)
Case of upper abdominal pain diagnose as a case of psydopancreatic cyst by abdominal CT- scan ,operation was done by laparoscope as gastrocytostomy (draining the cyst then open the posteriar stomach wall and anastomosis with the pancreatic cyst by use stiplar purple in color .the benefit of do this type of operation by laparoscope are noninvasive access like open laparotomy and short duration stay in hospital as early healing state and no scar of laparotomy laparotomy and also very low risk of wound infection and incisional hernia so my patient was discharge early in comparism with open laparotomy
Keywords: Stomach, laparoscopic surgery, pancrease, psydopancreatic cyst
Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes between Laparoscopic Greater Curvature Plication and Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (Published)
Background; laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) involves resection of a significant portion of the stomach. Laparoscopic greater curvature plication (LGCP) is a relatively new alternative procedure similar to LSG, but without the need for gastric resection.Patients and methods; one hundred patients included in our study in AL Jadria hospital in Baghdad and were assigned randomly to receive either LGCP (n = 50) [35 women and 15 men; mean age 32.1 years (19-49 years) and mean BMI 44.8 kg/m 2 (40-50 kg/m 2 )] or LSG (n = 50) [34 women and16 men; mean age 34.8 years (18-58 years) and mean BMI 46.8 kg/m 2 (41-55 kg/m 2 )] by a block randomization method. Patients were studied in terms of postoperative weight loss, and postoperative complications. Results; All procedures were completed laparoscopically. Follow-up was 24 months. The mean hospital stay was 36 h (range 24-96 h) for both groups. No intraoperative complications occurred. Postoperatively, one case of minor leak was detected after LSG and two cases of stenosis following LGCP. All patients experienced postoperative excess weight loss. Conclusion; LGCP is feasible, safe, and effective, but has an inferior weight-loss effect compared to LSG for morbidly obese patients with BMI above 40 kg/m 2 .
Keywords: Laparoscopicsleeve Gastrectomy, Stomach, Surgery, Weight Loss
Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes between Laparoscopic Greater Curvature Plication and Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy. (Published)
Background; laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) involves resection of a significant portion of the stomach. Laparoscopic greater curvature plication (LGCP) is a relatively new alternative procedure similar to LSG, but without the need for gastric resection.
Patients and methods; one hundred patients included in our study in AL Jadria hospital in Baghdad and were assigned randomly to receive either LGCP (n = 50) [35 women and 15 men; mean age 32.1 years (19-49 years) and mean BMI 44.8 kg/m 2 (40-50 kg/m 2 )] or LSG (n = 50) [34 women and16 men; mean age 34.8 years (18-58 years) and mean BMI 46.8 kg/m 2 (41-55 kg/m 2 )] by a block randomization method. Patients were studied in terms of postoperative weight loss, and postoperative complications. Results; All procedures were completed laparoscopically. Follow-up was 24 months. The mean hospital stay was 36 h (range 24-96 h) for both groups. No intraoperative complications occurred. Postoperatively, one case of minor leak was detected after LSG and two cases of stenosis following LGCP. All patients experienced postoperative excess weight loss. Conclusion; LGCP is feasible, safe, and effective, but has an inferior weight-loss effect compared to LSG for morbidly obese patients with BMI above 40 kg/m 2 .
Keywords: Laparoscopicsleeve Gastrectomy, Stomach, Surgery, Weight Loss
Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes between Laparoscopic Greater Curvature Plication and Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (Published)
Background; laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) involves resection of a significant portion of the stomach. Laparoscopic greater curvature plication (LGCP) is a relatively new alternative procedure similar to LSG, but without the need for gastric resection. Patients and methods; one hundred patients included in our study in AL Jadria hospital in Baghdad and were assigned randomly to receive either LGCP (n = 50) [35 women and 15 men; mean age 32.1 years (19-49 years) and mean BMI 44.8 kg/m 2 (40-50 kg/m 2 )] or LSG (n = 50) [34 women and16 men; mean age 34.8 years (18-58 years) and mean BMI 46.8 kg/m 2 (41-55 kg/m 2 )] by a block randomization method. Patients were studied in terms of postoperative weight loss, and postoperative complications. Results; All procedures were completed laparoscopically. Follow-up was 24 months. The mean hospital stay was 36 h (range 24-96 h) for both groups. No intraoperative complications occurred. Postoperatively, one case of minor leak was detected after LSG and two cases of stenosis following LGCP. All patients experienced postoperative excess weight loss. Conclusion; LGCP is feasible, safe, and effective, but has an inferior weight-loss effect compared to LSG for morbidly obese patients with BMI above 40 kg/m 2 .
Keywords: Laparoscopicsleeve Gastrectomy, Stomach, Surgery, Weight Loss